Scientific Publishing
Principle investigator: Jorge Contreras
The “serials crisis” in scientific publishing, in which academic libraries across the world have been forced to cancel subscriptions to scientific literature due to spiraling subscription rates, can be traced to the significant copyright rights demanded by publishers from academic authors. Current open access channels of distribution offer alternative approaches to scientific publishing, but neither the Green OA self-archiving nor the Gold OA author-pays models has yet achieved widespread acceptance. Moreover, recent proposals to abolish copyright protection for academic works, while theoretically attractive, may be difficult to implement in view of current legislative and judicial inclinations. Likewise, funder open access mandates such as the NIH OA Policy, which are already responsible for the public release of millions of scientific articles, suffer from various risks and political uncertainty. We are actively exploring the contours of this debate and formulating proposals to address the significant risk to scientific research presented by the current disfunction of the publishing industry.
News and Blogs
Still Waiting on Obama Administration Response to Online Petition.
Open Access White House Petition Takes Off!
Radio interview on Hearsay Culture – discussion of access to knowledge and scientific publishing.
Whitehouse Posts Comments Received on Public Access to Digital Data and Peer Reviewed Articles
Resources
Open Access Scientific Publishing and the Developing World. St. Antony’s International Review, Jorge Contreras, 2012.
Wait for it … Commons, Copyright and the Private (Re)Ordering of Scientific Publishing. Jorge Contreras, Working Paper, 2012.
Why Full Open Access Matters. PLoS Biology, Michael Carroll, 2011.
